Caution Urged Regarding Monday's UFO Press Conference
(please note the new article I posted today from Pop Culture on my blog. It is a report on what happened at the Press Conference today) c3hamby 11/12/2007
(CNN news report videos as well as the video from Larry King's show posted today.)
c3hamby 11/13/2007
I represent one of many people in the world that is excited about our government acknowledging life on other planets. When this happens, I will be the most excited and exuberant person on the planet. Many positive things have happened throughout the years that push us closer to that day and I am filled with incredible joy every time I see even the smallest amount of progress. Sometimes it is easy to overestimate that progress and what will come out of it. Is today the day? Is tomorrow? And it is so easy to become frustrated with the process, even when many good things are happening.
I'm finding a lot of 'chatter' on the internet, not only about tomorrow's press conference on UFOs at the National Press Club but also last night's Larry King show on UFOs.
These events represent progress toward government disclosure on the ET reality, no doubt about it. What we are seeing with these events is definite progress. For this, we should be grateful to James Fox and his 'Out of the Blue' movie that is featured on these two events. The upcoming press conference promises to include government and military officials from not just the US, but from seven countries. This is very significant because disclosure must be approached as a world-cooperative event.
With the truth confirmed, we are no longer separate citizens divided by political boundaries, but we become all, together, citizens of one Earth. We may choose to keep the governmental institutions we have presently, but the way that we think of ourselves in relation to each other and the rest of the universe will change upon official disclosure. The implications that arise from this new way of thought may be one of the major reasons this information has not already been disclosed. Of course there are many other implications, but those of us who are aware of this truth already realize this important world view change.
The other implications of ET disclosure need to be addressed in the public arena, these implications may be of greater importance than the ETs themselves.
Though I honestly hope I am wrong, it is for these reasons that caution should be urged at the expectation of a soon-to-come official ET disclosure event. Mainly because the governments of the Earth have done very little to prepare the world for such an event. Even though most of our population does believe in life outside of Earth, many still don't. Additionally, one only needs to consider the situation in the Middle East as proof that the US is still trying to hold on to their monopoly of world power. When disclosure and contact happens, it needs to come from united world powers, not from a country or a group of countries that are trying to gain military or economic advantage. Which is why this event indeed represents such a major milestone. Hopefully this event will put more international pressure on the US to disclose, and that is going to be an important factor in the disclosure process.
Additionally, Larry King's show and the press conference on Monday are both related to James Fox's "Out of the Blue" movie. I suspect that while these are still positive events, we may be hanging on to more hype involved than what is truly there.
Just this summer, Stephen Bassett and the 2007 X Conference held their own press conference at the National Press Club. There was minimal follow-up in the US press, but most of it was to make fun and minimize the whole event. And not even two weeks ago, Richard Hoagland held his own press conference at the National Press Club, and even though the American press was there, there was absolutely no follow up.
Russia, on the other hand covered this event extensively in their media, running coverage and post-event interviews repeatedly on their television networks.
While these events and the presidential campaign debates on UFOs are positive, let us keep our expectations in check and be patient during this slow process that is the Disclosure Movement.
14 Comments:
Your observations are optimistic, however, I believe somewhat nieve.
ETs have been visiting "us" (3rd Rock) for hundreds of thousands of years.
Unfortunately, there are still "Less-than-human" individuals, such as the president of Iran, who still believe that it is "their role" to destroy 'western' civilization. They do NOT believe in live & let-live.
Now if you for one minute think that this or any other kind of conference or talking will disuade this lunatic, then you belong at the U.N. - That's exactly what Neville Chamberlain thought... that appeasing the Nazis before they invaded Poland would end Hitler's craving for expansionism.
BIG misjudgement.
The U.S. desires to control no one... neither though can we afford to stick our head in the sand and tell ourselves "everything is alright... alright... alright - "I'm sorry, Dave, I can't let you do that...."
Enlightened.
What time is this press conference? (EST)
WHEN: Monday, November 12, 2007
11:00 AM
WHERE: National Press Club
Ballroom
Event open to credentialed media and Congressional staff only
Will they announce the results? If so, can you post them here? Thanks.
Event was broadcast on CNN live at 11am CST. Had some intersting information, I had already forgotten the impact of Fife's retraction.
There were some questions in the Q&A that I think other people not there could have done a good job fielding, such Jerome Clark, Jamie Maussan, Peter Davenport, or someone from the Hynek center. Would have loved to have someone there as a rep from the COMETA report, the Brazilian military (who supposedly opened up their UFO files recently), or the Belgium military involved with the flying triangle flap in the 80's.
On the positive side it was good that Dr. Greer was not mentioned. At least I didn't hear anything refrencing him in the content I heard.
I am hesitant whether anything will come out of it. With the phony FEMA conference and the obfuscation around renditions, I question whether this is a good time to be requesting openness in government. Although I do think something is going on either black project or other, it would be of much more value to channel the investigative engergy into exposing other Abu Ghraib's & injustices rather than devoting the energy to building a case for disclosure on the UFO phenomenon.
So what actually happened?
as soon as I hear something I will definitely post something. you might also check out the out of the blue movie website, I'm sure they will have updates posted there. They had Larry King show video posted within about 2 hours after the show ended.
good point Dr. Fong!
Anonymous made some good comments, but can you give us more info about what did happen?
Didn't mean to sound holier-than-thou with injustice comment, obviously I am drawn to this debate like a fly to a candle. Am watching Larry King live from last night and they covered a lot of the content from the meeting today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXmOHso6aB8
I was at the D.C. event:
http://bijanc.wordpress.com/
BCB
It's my opinion the USA has back engineered much of the technology and means of propulsion behind silent UFO's. I'm sure they do not want to share this very classified information on obviously advanced forms of energy production and how it is used for silent propulsion. Would they admit that oil has not been needed for fifty years but they just could'nt tell us ?
Tom
Thanks, Tom.
I believe that the main reason at this point for the government's failure to disclose is because they will implicate themselves for allowing us to damage the Earth and use up resource's unnecessarily. Plus, what were all those rocket fueled space trips all about if we have had more efficient access to space all these years.
I support a Truth Amnesty as presented by Alfred Webre at the X Conference this year in DC.
My personal opinion journey through all this has ranged from the ET concept to the implications of the quantum "string" theory. Net result? I don't know. Right now, I appear to be taking the "Prince of the Power of the Air" approach. This, of course, involves an extraordinarily careful second look at the Bible and the setting aside of a bunch of preconceptions. Sadly, the closest to any kind of a conclusion I can get is that these phenomena are anything but benign (and that governments in general share my confusion)
"Sadly, the closest to any kind of a conclusion I can get is that these phenomena are anything but benign (and that governments in general share my confusion)"
You and the governments may be correct in your 'confusion.
However, if the ETs are all that smart and needed to extinguish us, it would have been much smarter to do that before we had the atomic bomb. Smarter still to have done it right after we got the atomic bomb.
The fact they have not done so is in part indicative they are not bent on obliterating us.
Post a Comment
<< Home